View Full Version: The original Sugababes ARE definitely reforming

Sugababes UK > News > The original Sugababes ARE definitely reforming

Pages: [1] 2

Title: The original Sugababes ARE definitely reforming


ragdoll - November 3, 2009 05:44 PM (GMT)
When Keisha Buchanan got booted out of the Sugagbabes, loads of people thought it would be a great idea for her to reform the original lineup with Mutya and Siobhan. Well, that's exactly what is happening. *dramatic pause* TODAY.

Even as I type the three are in a second meeting with a potential producer (thought to be William Orbit or Stuart Price) and their label (thought to be Warners).

The label are keen for them to work with Orbit, but Siobhan is said to be reluctant.

On top of the new group deal, all three have been offered seperate solo deals as a bit of a sweetener.

This is pretty ace news for them (They were fucking great) but dreadful news for the current Sugababes, who can't seem to organise a piss up in a brewery at the moment.

Hurray to them!

source: http://08137edc.linkbucks.com/url/http://w...-reforming40299

just a rumour?

krajol - November 3, 2009 05:59 PM (GMT)
OMG :blink: :blink: :blink: Yes yes yes! Let be true!!!!!!

Jortt - November 3, 2009 06:30 PM (GMT)
OMG that would be f*cking in heaven!

Stuart Price <3
William Orbit <3
Sugababes 1.0 <3


Suganet - November 3, 2009 06:33 PM (GMT)
Please NO.

//

It's not true btw, http://bit.ly/4NoPL

Murder1 - November 3, 2009 06:33 PM (GMT)
YES!! i really hope so ! :P

BostonJames. - November 3, 2009 06:40 PM (GMT)
To good to be true!

~*!*~:Nicole:~*!*~ - November 3, 2009 06:46 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Suganet @ Nov 3 2009, 07:33 PM)
Please NO.

WTF why not?
They have more talent individually than the current ones put together, sorry to say...

I really hope this is true but I struggle to believe it. :(

Wow! - November 3, 2009 07:01 PM (GMT)
I would be so thrilled if they got back togethe. Stuart Price and William Orbit are my top producers too. This just seems to good to be true.

MoonRecords - November 3, 2009 07:03 PM (GMT)
Supposed this is true, would they get a new name?

Wow! - November 3, 2009 07:18 PM (GMT)
They would have to. Also I don't think they would be able to sing any of their old hits either.

SHAUN - November 3, 2009 07:23 PM (GMT)
so want this to be true
be back and forward to keishas twitter all night could be a late one

NuVirGuy - November 3, 2009 07:45 PM (GMT)
I remember how Keisha on her twitter said she's NOT about to reform the original Sugababes line-up ... so how can this be true?

mitsuhoney - November 3, 2009 08:21 PM (GMT)
LOL! What a whole bunch of crap that is, I can see Mutya and Keisha possibly in the future but Siobhan? :ph43r:

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 08:23 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Wow! @ Nov 3 2009, 09:18 PM)
They would have to. Also I don't think they would be able to sing any of their old hits either.

They'd have to use a different name, but considering they have writing credits on most of the previous material - they have every right to perform it. More so than "Sug4babes" anyways...

I've asked Mutya's manager about it and something is definitely happening, a close friend of Siobhan has also confirmed the same.

THIS IS TOO EXCITING :D

W2K - November 3, 2009 08:28 PM (GMT)
Well at least Mutya and Siobhan have finally realised they don't have and never will have what it takes to be a solo success if this is true LOL. I think Keisha could've done well though. I never supported V1 and I sure as Hell won't be starting now. V4 for the fucking win.

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 08:33 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (W2K @ Nov 3 2009, 10:28 PM)
Well at least Mutya and Siobhan have finally realised they don't have and never will have what it takes to be a solo success if this is true LOL. I think Keisha could've done well though. I never supported V1 and I sure as Hell won't be starting now. V4 for the fucking win.

Well if being successful means showing your tits in your music videos, I'd rather have them as less known, underground artists who have actual integrity.

And you can carry on being fed all this bullshit by the joke that "Sugababes" have become. They don't even respect what's left of their fans anymore. It's very sad really.

Also, Siobhan has more talent in her left toenail than Heidi, Jade & Amelle combined. I could say the same about Mutya, but everyone will say I'm biased about that.

W2K - November 3, 2009 08:40 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 09:33 PM)
Well if being successful means showing your tits in your music videos, I'd rather have them as less known, underground artists who have actual integrity.

And you can carry on being fed all this bullshit by the joke that "Sugababes" have become. They don't even respect what's left of their fans anymore. It's very sad really.

Also, Siobhan has more talent in her left toenail than Heidi, Jade & Amelle combined. I could say the same about Mutya, but everyone will say I'm biased about that.

Ok my dear, how about you have your opinion and I have mine? There's so so SO much I could say about what you've said but I respect what you have to say and don't feel the need to attack it. Anyway I have said what I have to say on this so-called wonderful news. I hope you all get what you want.

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 08:41 PM (GMT)
Fine by me. I never said you shouldn't have a different opinion. I was simply expressing mine.

Wow! - November 3, 2009 09:42 PM (GMT)
I will be def supporting V.1. if they re-formed.
I'm still sceptical about Siobhan though. She has so much hatred for Keisha especially in that recent interview she did. I just don't see Siobhan forgiving Keisha.

In Denial - November 3, 2009 10:10 PM (GMT)
I'd rather solo albums from Keisha and Siobhan.

It reeks of desperation to me.

Mr. Ace Reject - November 3, 2009 10:14 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 11:33 PM)
Well if being successful means showing your tits in your music videos, I'd rather have them as less known, underground artists who have actual integrity.


Yeah Amelle is showing her tits in their new music video and Mutya is promoting her new tits and new ass on TV. At least Amelle didn't do it on purpose.:rolleyes:

Well back on topic.
I can't really believe this. Didn't Keisha that all these rumours are false ? And I can't imagine Keisha and Siobhan back together. Besides Keisha has already started writing her solo material.

Suganet - November 3, 2009 10:17 PM (GMT)
And why is everyone so excited about this reforming? They were never succesfull with the Siobhan, Mutya and Keisha line-up.


kal1ch - November 3, 2009 10:44 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Suganet @ Nov 4 2009, 12:17 AM)
And why is everyone so excited about this reforming? They were never succesfull with the Siobhan, Mutya and Keisha line-up.

I know it's hard to believe, but some artists are more about the quality of the music than the sales. The original Sugababes line-up was like that.

BostonJames. - November 3, 2009 10:52 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 10:44 PM)
I know it's hard to believe, but some artists are more about the quality of the music than the sales. The original Sugababes line-up was like that.

One of the best things i've read on this forum in days.
Couldnt agree more.

Mr. Ace Reject - November 3, 2009 10:58 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 4 2009, 01:44 AM)
I know it's hard to believe, but some artists are more about the quality of the music than the sales. The original Sugababes line-up was like that.

I agree with that, but on the other side it was you Kal who said several times after Mutya left that the upcoming post-Mutya album will flop. In this case you also were about the sales weren't you ?

In Denial - November 3, 2009 11:02 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 10:44 PM)
I know it's hard to believe, but some artists are more about the quality of the music than the sales. The original Sugababes line-up was like that.

Which is why they were dropped.

Face it, the public don't care about the quality of music anymore. If they did artists like Siobhan would do well.

This is the reason why people like Cheryl Cole are doing well.

Kiku - November 3, 2009 11:09 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 10:44 PM)
I know it's hard to believe, but some artists are more about the quality of the music than the sales. The original Sugababes line-up was like that.

Thats why I was totally into them from day 1.
That was what make them different from the rest of the girlbands and Pop acts of the time. Doing credible and fun music without the flesh showing.

When the "Taller" promo started and then later when Amelle joined it all went downhill on that theme... a weak Poppy album, then a boring "look at us, we still do credible music" album and now... oh well. :ph43r:

Thats why I keep saying, it'll be all about sales and sexiness now. No more good credible music from them. Keisha was the one who was still trying to hold that on the band. Now kill me.

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 11:11 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Mr. Ace Reject @ Nov 4 2009, 12:58 AM)
I agree with that, but on the other side it was you Kal who said several times after Mutya left that the upcoming post-Mutya album will flop. In this case you also were about the sales weren't you ?

Nitpicking much? I don't even remember, but I probably said I hope it would flop.

And what's my take on things have to do with the fact Sugababes v1 were about the music while from v3 onward we're getting more and more sex.

Sugababes v.1: Make music they like, and hope it sells.

v.2 were more commercial but they still did what they liked, not what was hot at the moment, and it still had that Sugababes sound...

I know many of you love Amelle, fair enough, but ever since she joined the b®and all they've been doing is jumping on bandwagons and working with the "HOTTEST" producers. Some of their output was indeed very good (C&S) but they kinda lost their identity.

Let me get this straight, if THE REAL SUGABABES are indeed reforming I couldn't care less if they sell by the bucketloads or not. I obviously want them to be successful, because it's nice to get recognition, but it's not the most important thing for me.


QUOTE
Which is why they were dropped.

Face it, the public don't care about the quality of music anymore. If they did artists like Siobhan would do well.

This is the reason why people like Cheryl Cole are doing well.


But I refuse to conform to this. And so should other people. The music industry can't be this doomed, can it? There is still hope...

Mr. Ace Reject - November 3, 2009 11:14 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 4 2009, 02:11 AM)
Nitpicking much? I don't even remember, but I probably said I hope it would flop.


Just because I seem to have a better memory I'm not nitpicking.

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 11:18 PM (GMT)
It still has zero relevance to the topic about Sugababes v1 being about the music, not the face or the money.

In Denial - November 3, 2009 11:19 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 11:11 PM)
Nitpicking much? I don't even remember, but I probably said I hope it would flop.

And what's my take on things have to do with the fact Sugababes v1 were about the music while from v3 onward we're getting more and more sex.

Sugababes v.1: Make music they like, and hope it sells.

v.2 were more commercial but they still did what they liked, not what was hot at the moment, and it still had that Sugababes sound...

I know many of you love Amelle, fair enough, but ever since she joined the b®and all they've been doing is jumping on bandwagons and working with the "HOTTEST" producers. Some of their output was indeed very good (C&S) but they kinda lost their identity.

Let me get this straight, if THE REAL SUGABABES are indeed reforming I couldn't care less if they sell by the bucketloads or not. I obviously want them to be successful, because it's nice to get recognition, but it's not the most important thing for me.


QUOTE
Which is why they were dropped.

Face it, the public don't care about the quality of music anymore. If they did artists like Siobhan would do well.

This is the reason why people like Cheryl Cole are doing well.


But I refuse to conform to this. And so should other people. The music industry can't be this doomed, can it? There is still hope...

As long as people like Cheryl Cole and The Saturdays do well then no there's no hope.

kal1ch - November 3, 2009 11:23 PM (GMT)
Hmm.. but there will always be the more underground acts, which, like Siobhan, make brilliant music and go unrecognized.

I just find it really sad that the charts are dominated by the same kind of sound and producers. No one dares to experiment and be interesting anymore.

But yeah.. Sugababes v1...

BostonJames. - November 3, 2009 11:38 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (In Denial @ Nov 3 2009, 11:19 PM)
QUOTE (kal1ch @ Nov 3 2009, 11:11 PM)
Nitpicking much? I don't even remember, but I probably said I hope it would flop.

And what's my take on things have to do with the fact Sugababes v1 were about the music while from v3 onward we're getting more and more sex.

Sugababes v.1: Make music they like, and hope it sells.

v.2 were more commercial but they still did what they liked, not what was hot at the moment, and it still had that Sugababes sound...

I know many of you love Amelle, fair enough, but ever since she joined the b®and all they've been doing is jumping on bandwagons and working with the "HOTTEST" producers. Some of their output was indeed very good (C&S) but they kinda lost their identity.

Let me get this straight, if THE REAL SUGABABES are indeed reforming I couldn't care less if they sell by the bucket loads or not. I obviously want them to be successful, because it's nice to get recognition, but it's not the most important thing for me.


QUOTE
Which is why they were dropped.

Face it, the public don't care about the quality of music anymore. If they did artists like Siobhan would do well.

This is the reason why people like Cheryl Cole are doing well.


But I refuse to conform to this. And so should other people. The music industry can't be this doomed, can it? There is still hope...

As long as people like Cheryl Cole and The Saturdays do well then no there's no hope.

I'm sorry, you know i love you Luke
But its not right that you should say that about Cheryl and the Sats
when you admire Britney Spears, She's the DEFINITION.
I dont want to turn this into a britney bashing, shes got her positives
but shes as bad, if not worse, as those your accusing.
Its just the principle.

They have BRILLIANT tracks given to them
And that's how they get by

Somtimes i wander whats right
Should a singer just sing, and writers and producers make the music
in that respect theyre both doing their thing
the singers a vessel for the creator of the song, that seems right to me
But its seen as the right thing if singers get involved
i can see how thats important, but its blurred the line
Even though i prefer this method.

What would everyone say is the right way?
if even just the one atall.

In Denial - November 3, 2009 11:44 PM (GMT)
I actually included Britney when I orginally wrote that post saying that if the public cared about the quality of music Christina would be doing much better than Britney at the moment. But because who Britney is and the tracks she's given she does well.

Deleted that comment though as I felt bad posting it! lol

BostonJames. - November 3, 2009 11:47 PM (GMT)
Nuhu, dont feel bad haha! its true
I dont think its so much a dig at the artist
they both just represent completely opposite things in the industry

In Denial - November 3, 2009 11:51 PM (GMT)
I personally don't care about the artist's input into a song. As long as the song itself is good that's all that matters.

BostonJames. - November 4, 2009 12:02 AM (GMT)
I like input into the song itself
though i could leave it
i mainly look for input into everything else
the videos, the shoots, all of that.
a real involvement and general passion for it.
Dare i say it, but i think Lady Gaga has everything balanced perfectly.

AmelleLover26m - November 4, 2009 09:19 AM (GMT)
We heard somthing very similar to this a few weeks back and t built up a snowball which turned into nothing but a press rumor.

It is an exciting idea and the prospect of it sounds intreeging but until we hear somthing offical - one of them actually coming out and stating it publically all it is, is a rumor from a journlist making up a story.

However as we have seen in the past these things can become bigger and just for once somthing positive seems to have emerged from all this - so I do hope we hear more about this as resulting to chuking it all in the fire like last time so to speak.

How they would actually fair though is a different matter - some combacks fail some succeed.

W2K - November 4, 2009 11:08 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Warner Denies Original Sugababes Reunion

Warner Records has denied claims that it approached the three original Sugababes about reuniting.

Reports yesterday suggested that the label had offered Keisha Buchanan, Mutya Buena and Siobhan Donaghy a group deal and individual solo contracts.

"We haven't seen them here or heard anything about it. I don't think they've got the story right," a statement reads.

The first lineup rose to fame in 2000 with 'Overload' and released album One Touch together. Siobhan quit the group a year later, followed by Mutya Buena in December 2005. Keisha Buchanan became the last original member to leave in September.

Island Records, the current Sugababes label, has yet to comment on the reports.

kal1ch - November 4, 2009 11:54 AM (GMT)
I love how they twist the headline to make it more 'exciting'.

All Warner denied is that they approached the girls. No one said if they aren't really getting back together.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree