Check this out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPS_2000 Homemades anyone? B)

:lol: That is funny.

That would make sense though, wikipedia is edited by everyone that cares enough to edit it, and feels that they know enough about the subject too edit it. When relating to water guns those things pretty much narrows it down to the online soaker community. And, since many people have read an opinion like that the editor just put it in.

If you mean that part, then yeah I guess it's kind of funny. B)

It's funny, although I think they took Ben's comments into consideration more than mine. I don't hate the 2000, while it isn't worth over $100, it is still a great gun and I would rather use that than anything new.

This does sound much like something I would write. Checking the history does reveal that I did edit it, and you can see exactly what I changed: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=39318616

My personal opinion of the CPS 2000 is that it gets more credit than it is due, and I wanted to put that into the previously completely biased CPS 2000 article. ;)

Ha ha, that article is great...check out a later edit, and you'll see something quite interesting. Somebody should make a link to SM, at least once v2 is completed.

Thankfully, somebody with some common sense took out that part afterwards...