View Full Version: Nut case? Or is he onto something?

Rant N Rave > Current Events > Nut case? Or is he onto something?


Title: Nut case? Or is he onto something?


Pearl Bailey - October 31, 2009 07:03 AM (GMT)
I realize this looks like TMI, but it's worth reading—especially if you care about our country.

David Kaiser is a respected historian whose published works have covered a broad range of topics, from European Warfare to American League Baseball. Born in 1947, the son of a diplomat, Kaiser spent his childhood in three capital cities: Washington D.C, Albany, New York, and Dakar, Senegal. He attended Harvard University, graduating there in 1969 with a B.A. in history. He then spent several years more at Harvard, gaining a PhD in history, which he obtained in 1976. He served in the Army Reserve from 1970 to 1976.

He is a professor in the Strategy and Policy Department of the United States Naval War College. He has previously taught at Carnegie Mellon, Williams College and Harvard University. Kaiser's latest book, The Road to Dallas, about the Kennedy assassination, was just published by Harvard University Press.



History Unfolding

I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learned just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of "we the people," who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy.. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity.. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and I know precisely what I am talking about) - the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth.. It is potentially 1929 x ten...And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who, in turn, cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And finally, we have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe are more important.)

Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change. Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning..

As a serious student of history, I thought I would never come to experience what the ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In those times, the "savior" was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory. Conservative "losers" read it right now.

And there were the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did - regularly. And then, he was duly elected to office, while a full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand - the Great Depression. Slowly, but surely he seized the controls of government power, person by person, department by department, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The children of German citizens were at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were required to do so. No Jews of course,

How did he get people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world. He did it with a compliant media - did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and ....... change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

If you think I am exaggerating, look it up. It's all there in the history books.

So read your history books. Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world came to regret that he was not listened to.

Do not forget that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me..

I choose to believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree, perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next elections.

David Kaiser
Jamestown , Rhode Island
United

Nacho - October 31, 2009 09:39 AM (GMT)
Food for thought! :yup:

Heretic - October 31, 2009 03:37 PM (GMT)
A nut case? Hardly. If anything, he’s understating the situation. A lot of us are focused on Chairman Brawk :ph43r: right now – not without good reason – but consider the broader implications of what he’s saying here: “Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.”

Ten to fifteen years? I would argue it goes back farther than that. Hasn’t anyone wondered about this peculiar Bush/Clinton Presidential two-step? Was this not very nearly another Clinton Presidency? Would things be any different if it were? And just today, before I even logged onto the Rant, I saw another fascinating headline: “A Bush goes to War”, regarding George P. Bush, the half-Mexican son of Jeb Bush. One of the poll questions was something along the lines of ‘could George P. be President one day?’ Why would such a question even be asked in a supposed representative republic; a republic that once threw off the shackles of a hereditary monarchy? Now it seems we’re straddled with something much worse: a more or less permanent class of elites who rule under the auspices of ‘popular’ elections - elections largely attended by a subservient class of semi-literate, government educated fools. We willingly give these elites the power to enslave us, and then thump our chests about our wonderful ‘Democracy’. Is it any wonder other people view us with suspicion?

I hope we wake up in time to stop this travesty before it reaches fruition. I’m not especially confident that we will. :nope:

Pearl Bailey - October 31, 2009 04:37 PM (GMT)
Well said, Heretic.

This video is over two hours long, but it's loaded with information about what is being done to us and our country and should be watched by all Americans.

guest1 - October 31, 2009 04:59 PM (GMT)
:wgaf:

guest1 - November 1, 2009 05:23 AM (GMT)
Baa-ah-ah-ah
Baa-ah-ah-ah

Baa Ram Ewe
to your fleece be true.

sKewL - November 1, 2009 05:28 AM (GMT)
$0 + (2 x $0) = 3 x $0

$0 + (2 x $0) - (3 x $0) = $0 - (3 x $0)

$0 + $0 - $0 = $0 - $0

$0 = $0

I don't see why that is hard to understand.

Mr Nise - November 1, 2009 02:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?


and what have we been doing since the end of WWII to every country we've been dealing with. We rebuilt Europe and Japan lots of money has gone to South America and every undeveloped country in the world. So ?? Why is he wondering about banks lending money to Americans who can't pay the money back, been there, done that globally!! ? Everybody complains about unemployment, so ?? Yet the elected representatives turn a blind eye to jobs that are outsourced overseas, I guess the dems are with the republicans and Bush when they say American jobs are a commidty to be traded, nobody in congress thinks we need them. Jesus why did Rome fall ? Because of corruption in government and letting forigners become citizens, everybody hated Rome, the Huns,the Vandals,the Visigoths, they hated the way Rome did buisness but envied it's wealth,and were not adverse to the idea of trading with them until they saw weakness and pounced. The Treaty of Versilles was forced down the throats of the German people, if it wasn't for the punitive economic provisions of that treaty Hitler would never have gotten out of the beer hall. What history has shown time and again is that Republics fall. Greece, the Roman Republic, even the so called Union of Soviet Socialist republics fell, so this republic isn't immune either is it??>?

Chadi - November 1, 2009 06:56 PM (GMT)
dis noe make da sensse. i want da freee monny frum Amerrika! :yup:




Hosted for free by InvisionFree