Title: New THE LIVING DEAD AT THE MANCHESTER MORGUE...
Description: DVD Box -- Spoiler?
Mike Thomas - February 20, 2008 03:09 AM (GMT)
Doesn't showing the film's lead character as a zombie on the cover of the DVD spoil it somewhat?
JEFFREY ALLEN RYDELL - February 20, 2008 04:41 AM (GMT)
Well, I got a lotta crap for responding as I'm about to to the same question on another board - but I'm a glutton for punishment, so here goes:
| QUOTE (Mike Thomas @ Feb 19 2008, 10:09 PM) |
| Doesn't showing the film's lead character as a zombie on the cover of the DVD spoil it somewhat? |
If it didn't, you just did! ;)
Craig Blamer - February 20, 2008 05:00 AM (GMT)
Um... maybe he's only pretending to be a zombie. You know, to get by the other ones...
Marty McKee - February 20, 2008 05:05 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Craig Blamer @ Feb 19 2008, 11:00 PM) |
| Um... maybe he's only pretending to be a zombie. You know, to get by the other ones... |
The zombie experts around me claim that's impossible, that the zombies can spot an imposter, but I don't believe them.
Craig Blamer - February 20, 2008 05:15 AM (GMT)
Ahumph.
It's been established that if you rub yourself down with the rotting flesh of a zombie before trying it, you can pass.
JEFFREY ALLEN RYDELL - February 20, 2008 06:42 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Marty McKee @ Feb 20 2008, 12:05 AM) |
| The zombie experts around me... |
They're gathering around you, Marty - look, there comes one of them now!
William D'Annucci - February 20, 2008 07:28 AM (GMT)
I'm not sayin' if the cover is a spoiler, but it sure is rotten! I can't believe that was the approved artwork. It looks like some quick cut n paste job thrown together before lunch. Ironic, as it is the same cropped photo on different backgrounds that showed up in the original movie posters. The film is so much better than the art implies. Shame.
Eric Cotenas - February 20, 2008 07:37 AM (GMT)
Apparently this version also uses the LIVING DEAD AT MANCHESTER MORGUE title sequence. Did they find a film element for it? I remember it was included as one of the alternate title sequences on the UK disc but I think that was video sourced (or sourced from a print with the expected wear).
William D'Annucci - February 20, 2008 07:52 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Eric Cotenas @ Feb 20 2008, 02:37 AM) |
| Apparently this version also uses the LIVING DEAD AT MANCHESTER MORGUE title sequence. Did they find a film element for it? I remember it was included as one of the alternate title sequences on the UK disc but I think that was video sourced (or sourced from a print with the expected wear). |
| QUOTE |
The first, most striking difference between the respective prints used for the two releases involves the opening credits: Anchor Bay’s CORPSES moniker (which sounds like some sequel to ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN) is well-integrated into the titles it’s part of (i.e. it’s the same font and doesn’t interrupt any action), while BU’s MANCHESTER sequence is suddenly interrupted by pretty cheesy sound-wave animation, a leering zombie face and wonky title-card graphics that seem out of place given the tone of the rest of the material.
|
Victor Boston - February 20, 2008 10:20 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Anchor Bay’s CORPSES moniker (which sounds like some sequel to ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN) is well-integrated into the titles it’s part of (i.e. it’s the same font and doesn’t interrupt any action) |
I thought that was because those titles simply replaced a complete sequence wholesale.
| QUOTE |
| BU’s MANCHESTER sequence is suddenly interrupted by pretty cheesy sound-wave animation, a leering zombie face and wonky title-card graphics that seem out of place given the tone of the rest of the material. |
That sounds like the original title sequence to me and that "cheesy" animation is pretty cool IHMO recalling the inventive BLOOD AND BLACK LACE titles that were added to the US version. I have an old uncut pre-cert tape of THE LIVING DEAD AT MANCHESTER MORGUE and these are the titles I wanted to see on a definitive edition of the film. They intercut a sequence of a girl streaking through a city street - a baffling introduction that seems to bear no relevance to the feature proper.
Again it's probably a matter of personal preference if alternate title sequences were legitimately created for different territories but I'll favour the one which doesn't drop actual footage regardless of how important it is to the narrative.
Victor.
POST SCRIPT: I've just seen a screen grab of the new title and that doesn't look like the "original" one from the UK Pre-Cert unless I'm mistaken. Someone needs to clarify this mystery. My understanding is : That the old Anchor Bay dropped the city streak and had complete text titles and no ghoul artwork or sound wave animations. The new disc has all this restored but possibly loses the original LIVING DEAD AT MANCHESTER MORGUE card and replaces it with a new one. The devil is in the details!
Marc Edward Heuck - February 21, 2008 01:49 AM (GMT)
I'm curious - what did title sequence for Hallmark's DON'T OPEN THE WINDOW release look like in comparison? Anyone remember?
William D'Annucci - February 21, 2008 05:43 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Victor Boston @ Feb 20 2008, 05:20 AM) |
| POST SCRIPT: I've just seen a screen grab of the new title and that doesn't look like the "original" one from the UK Pre-Cert unless I'm mistaken. Someone needs to clarify this mystery. My understanding is : That the old Anchor Bay dropped the city streak and had complete text titles and no ghoul artwork or sound wave animations. The new disc has all this restored but possibly loses the original LIVING DEAD AT MANCHESTER MORGUE card and replaces it with a new one. The devil is in the details! |
The Anchor Bay release begins with George closing up his shop. After he departs on his motorcycle, we cut to the interior of the shop and a long slow prowling shot that ends on the spooky painting behind George's desk. The credits play over this shot with some very creepy atmospheric music. After that, the movie cuts to George's journey out of the city, with the "ecology" montage and the Afro-streaker all included.
Terry Barhorst, Jr. - February 21, 2008 04:31 PM (GMT)
I've got the old BU (Anchor Bay's master I suppose) LET SLEEPING CORPSES LIE, extras and anamorphic transfer (I guess the anamorphic transfer would be enough for a lot of people) aside, is there enough of a improvement picture-wise and are there any differences in the movies themselves (beyond the opening credits), to make this a worthwhile double-dip?
Scooter McCrae - February 21, 2008 07:43 PM (GMT)
I'd just like to add that when I wrote my review for the Fangoria website I was sent the discs sans cover artwork of any kind. Had I seen the incompetently (even insultingly) designed cover they ended up using I can assure you I would have dedicated at least a few sentences to the sheer awfulness of it (as well as the spoilerish nature of it as well). Even more of a pity since the film has so many wonderful pieces of poster artwork to have chosen a cover from.
-Scooter McCrae
Michael Blanton - February 22, 2008 08:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Marty McKee @ Feb 19 2008, 11:05 PM) |
| The zombie experts around me claim that's impossible, that the zombies can spot an imposter, but I don't believe them. |
Fakin' being a zombie sorta worked in SHAUN OF THE DEAD.