Many opinions on this trilogy and author is welcome. Personally though I'm appalled at how low the standards of publishing has become.
Yeah before I get on to my actual school work I'm gonna have to comment on this, like I've been itching to ever since I skimmed through the
first chapter on her website a few weeks ago. Some may or may not know,
Cassandra Claire is apparantly big in HP fandom (which I try to stay away from because sorry, I think it's icky). She wrote some really big fanfics that were filled with lines she lifted from published books and television shows (anywhere from Pride and Prejudice to Buffy). Now she's got
a book published.
The first chapter which I've linked above is very
very poorly written. It isn't a good sign when the phrases of the book are so awkward that they actually take you out of the story itself. Worst lines were probably:
It was always easy. He could already feel the power of her evaporating life coursing through his veins like fire. and
Clary liked the lilt to his shoulders, the way he tossed his hair as he went. There was a word for him that her mother would have used - Insouciant. Those just actually made me mad. There were so many things wrong with them even beyond what
this post and
this post pointed out. Just wrong.
The book is so derivative and cliched. Of course, fictional literature is largely about reusing *basic* ideas and concepts: in fact JK Rowling is NOT the first person to think up the idea of sending a child to a school for witches and wizards. One can even follow that idea all the way back to The Worst Witch by British author Jill Murphy in the 70's. Even the basic idea of a child learning some special ability at school that he/she can't learn in a normal school has been done before. And yet, Harry Potter despite having these borrowed concepts is on whole quite unique and well-written.
A bad sign for a book is when you can literally erase the names, put in the names of different characters and have nearly the same story as something else that came before it and it's practically been done in the mst I linked above. Cassandra Clare, judging by the first book, has made it far too close to Buffy for comfort.
But you know what really gets me? Even if you just look at the writing, this book doesn't deserve to be published. And yet it is. Why? Well she's got a fanbase I suppose and to the publishers that instantly = $. Despite the quality of the book, if they can all make money who really cares, right?
Anyway I'd like to hear what others think. Fans are welcome too, I'd like to hear why people support her...