View Full Version: Humanities Aquatic Thermal Accumulation.

Al Gore Support Center Online Forum 2008 :: A Reality Based Organization Fighting For Al Gore! > Environmental Issues > Humanities Aquatic Thermal Accumulation.



Title: Humanities Aquatic Thermal Accumulation.
Description: Another unnatural human contribution.


Peacemaker58 - May 8, 2008 08:54 PM (GMT)
Humanities Aquatic Thermal Contribution. This is one massive human contribution that has gotten little to no attention from the scientific community. Yet there are serious indicators that clearly suggest that this unnatural thermal contribution has accumulated within the aquatic structure. There are raised thermal readings throughout the world at 300 meters, with some locations showing apparent unnatural thermal indicators at depths of 1,200 meters. This is a condition that the raised levels of CO2 could not have created. Al Gore did a wonderful job of exposing humanities CO2 contribution and its potential side effects. I'd like all of you to request that Al Gore and his scientist friends look into this little considered massive human contribution that has apparently been accumulating within the aquatic structure. I personally did a study on this condition myself and found it to be a joint contributor to "Global Warming" and the planets melting ice. Common sense suggests that if this growing thermal contribution accumulates within the aquatic structure then it must be changing that environment. If it were to accumulate, where would it most likely be leaching out? Again common sense says within our planets colder regions, because this is the weak link in the oceans downwards conductivity, due to the colder surface water temperatures. Coincidentally, this is where the temperatures are also rising the fastest. I did a controlled experiment to see if ice would melt slower within waters where a downwards direction of conduction was present, as compared to waters with a neutral or upwards direction of conduction, with the water temperature remaining the same under all conditions. I was shocked to see the difference, and I believe that this "loss of a downwards direction of conduction" is exactly what has caused our planets ice to be melting away twelve times faster than any scientist had predicted. With a downwards direction of conduction present within 38 degree water, a measured ice cube took over an hour and a half to melt away (95 minutes), where as it only took eight (8) minutes to completely melt away the very same sized ice cube in water where there was no "downwards direction of conduction" like that normally present within most of the aquatic structure. I feel strongly that the surface area where this downwards direction of conduction is being lost is expanding by the day, due to both the CO2 accumulation and the direct human thermal footprint within the aquatic structure. Thereby addressing just the CO2 accumulation would not do enough to return the natural downwards direction of conduction to those colder regions of our planet in a reasonable amount of time, if at all. Not while allowing out thermal intrusion within the aquatic environment to continue to grow. Think about it people!

asgard2 - May 22, 2008 05:27 AM (GMT)
I looked this up and I can't find much on the subject.

I can only guess that Humanities in this context means "Human Activity" but feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

So what is "Humanities Aquatic Thermal Contribution" aside from human activity that effects low level ocean conduction.

How is it produced or what is causing it? What is your theory for countering it, if you have one?




Hosted for free by InvisionFree