From Free Republic:
Mark Warner's Clinton ProblemPosted on 10/13/2006 10:27:20 AM PDT by SDGOP
The former Virginia governor has decided not to run for president in 2008, saying he doesn't want to spend precious moments away from his wife and three daughters.
"This is the right time for me ... to have a life for a little while," said Warner, considered to be the only Democrat with any chance of taking on Hillary Clinton. But the man the New York Times declared in March to be "The Anti-Hillary" might actually have a lot in common with her husband.
D.C. insiders are speculating that his surprise pull-out may have been sparked by concerns that alleged past sexual indiscretions could derail his campaign—especially in the midst of theMark Foley feeding frenzy.
"I can't believe no one has mentioned his philandering," a former political aide tells Radar, adding that she herself was subjected to Warner's advances in the late '90s and had heard "stories about Mark and many interns."
"This can't be isolated. I have to believe this stuff is all over," a former D.C. consultant tells Radar.
"It would be ironic if the anti-Hillary faction's best hope turned out to have the same problem as Bill," the consultant said.
Link:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718884/postsWithout offering any credible evidence & often refers the sources as 'former political aide' or 'former D.C. consultant', this shameless, dispicable, appalling, far-right website certainly has no right at all to speculate unfairly on Governor Warner's decision not to run. By trying to smear a good man whose bravado, which should be saluted, in putting his ambitions aside for the good of his family, the far-right has gone too far. This is the kind of extremism we do not need in America. Absolutely shameless. Totally inhuman.