View Full Version: Hillary Meter: 43% View Senator Clinton as Liberal

Al Gore Support Center Online Forum 2008 :: A Reality Based Organization Fighting For Al Gore! > General Democratic Talk > Hillary Meter: 43% View Senator Clinton as Liberal



Title: Hillary Meter: 43% View Senator Clinton as Liberal


ALGOREismylife - October 8, 2006 04:56 PM (GMT)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/rasmussen/20061006...DMzBHNlYwM3MDM-

Hillary Meter: 43% View Senator Clinton as Liberal

rasmussenreports.com
Fri Oct 6, 12:17 PM ET

The latest Hillary Meter finds that 43% of Americans view the former First Lady as politically liberal. Another 30% say she's a moderate and 10% see her as conservative. That reflects a very slight shift to the right from our previous survey (see trends).

Currently New York's junior Senator is perceived as being 50 points to the left of the nation's political center. Two weeks ago, she was 54 points left of the nation's political center. A month ago, she held a position 3 points closer to the center at 51.

The political center is calculated by subtracting the number of liberals from the number of conservatives among the general public (35% conservative, 18% liberal for a net +17). For the Senator, 10% conservative minus 43% liberal equals a net minus 33. The minus 33 reading for Senator Clinton is 50 points away from the plus 17 reading for the general public.

By way of comparison, former Vice President Al Gore is seen by the public as further to the left than both Senator Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton. Republican Presidential hopefuls John McCain and Rudy Giuliani are seen as closer to the nation's political center. President George W. Bush is 29 points to the right of center.

The current Hillary Meter survey shows that 45% hold a favorable opinion of Clinton, up 5 from the last survey. The number with an unfavorable opinion is down by 4 to 40%. Among women, 50% have a favorable opinion. That figure rises to 62% among women under 40.

Twenty-four (24%) of Americans now believe that Senator Hillary Clinton is "very likely" to be the Democratic Presidential nominee in 2008, a one point increase over the last survey, which was the lowest level ever recorded in more than three dozen Hillary Meter surveys dating back to April 2005.

If she is on the Presidential ballot in 2008, 37% of Americans say they would definitely vote against Senator Clinton. That's down two points from 39% two weeks ago. Thirty-two percent (32%) say they would definitely vote for her, relatively unchanged from the previous survey (see trends). In every edition of the Hillary Meter, a plurality of Americans have said they would definitely vote against her.

The Hillary Meter is a twice monthly measure of Senator Hillary Clinton's effort to move to the political center. The next update is scheduled for Thursday, October 19, 2006. For as long as the former First Lady is a viable candidate for the White House, Rasmussen Reports will monitor public perceptions of her political ideology.

The national telephone survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted by Rasmussen Reports October 1-2, 2006. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.


earthmother - October 9, 2006 03:24 PM (GMT)
This is nonsense. Gore is much more of a moderate than Hillary. The MSM have painted Gore as a left-wing hysteric. Hillary is the one who's a knee-jerk liberal, which is one reason I don't like her.

dbciii - October 9, 2006 06:46 PM (GMT)
Actually, it seems to me Gore has gotten a decent reception from MSM w/respect to book and movie. Yes, they include a comment from Inhofe here and there, and of course some of the jackassess like carlson or oreilly say stupid crap to get attention, but they aren't, IMO, MSM. MSM are WSJ, NYT, Time, Newsweek, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, etc. And the hard-news components (such as they are) of the cablenews outlets.

But something like oreilly is no more "hard news" than is "the daily show". It is entertainment.

The term "media" is a misnomer. Originally the expression was "news media", meant to replace the term "press" when that was obsoleted by the advent of media other than ink and paper via printing press to deliver news. Then lazy-english took over, and it was shortened to just "media". But that is a meaningless term. heck, oil painting is an art form that uses "media" - oil paints and canvas; likewise charcoal sketching uses the media of paper and charcoal. Many forms of entertainment use media such as film or video. Now the term "mainstream media" is used somehow to identify, presumably, the traditional NEWS outlets, distinguish them from something like drudge.

Unfortunately, though, large segments of the population cannot distinguish. That is why I lament the demise of the Fourth Estate. That term was coined to refer to the special role of the "free and independent press" in serving as the people's watchdog over the three branches of government.

There are few legal constraints on what constitutes "real news" and distinguishes it from "opinion/editorial". Responsible journalists make the distinction themselves.
In today's world, where ratings mean more than honor, that line is generally blurred, or erased. I still, though, think that the relics of the real MSM have given Gore a decent, albeit tepid, response in the US, and he has gotten strong reviews overseas.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree