View Full Version: U.S. News & World Report Writer Criticizes Gore

Al Gore Support Center Online Forum 2008 :: A Reality Based Organization Fighting For Al Gore! > Gore Grassroots Media Watch Group > U.S. News & World Report Writer Criticizes Gore



Title: U.S. News & World Report Writer Criticizes Gore
Description: says he stretches the truth


earthmother - October 10, 2005 09:17 PM (GMT)
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/baron...one_051007b.htm

10/7/05
Poor Al Gore

Brendan Nyhan, a liberal blogger who was involved with the admirable www.spinsanity.org website, takes a quick look at a recent speech by Al Gore. He points out that Gore takes arguably fair arguments against the Bush administration (in this case, on its dealings with the press) and stretches them beyond where the facts will take them. Here's Nyhan: "There's no evidence that the White House 'placed' Jeff Gannon/Guckert in the White House press pool–they merely approved his credential. The journalists they allegedly paid for positive stories were actually pundits (Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher), not 'reporters.' And the claim that 'every day they unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts to harass and hector any journalist who is critical of the president' is also unsubstantiated–the administration certainly pushes back against press coverage it doesn't like, but what evidence exists that they 'unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts' against journalists each day?"

This tendency to stretch truth into falsehood eventually got Gore into trouble in the 2000 campaign and, as Nyhan points out, he continues to do the same today. As one of the 648 registered Democrats who voted for Gore in the 1988 District of Columbia presidential primary, I'm sad to see him at this again; it seems to be a character flaw in a man who is entitled to claim that he has made many constructive contributions to public policy over many years. I continue to admire Brendan Nyhan, with whom I once had a constructive E-mail correspondence, as a liberal who places honesty and accuracy ahead of scoring partisan points.


Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications — including the Economist and the New York Times.

Garden Stater - October 10, 2005 10:40 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
And the claim that 'every day they unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts to harass and hector any journalist who is critical of the president' is also unsubstantiated–the administration certainly pushes back against press coverage it doesn't like, but what evidence exists that they 'unleash squadrons of digital brownshirts' against journalists each day?"
QUOTE
CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR CNN CORRESPONDENT
AMANPOUR: Certainly television, and perhaps to an extent,
my station, was intimidated by the administration and its
foot soldiers at Fox News. And it did in fact, put a
climate of fear and self-censorship, in my view, in terms
of, of, of the kind of broadcast work we did.


As far as Gannon goes, come on, the guy wrote for a website called GOPnews.com, once on C-Span he said "Fox News i by no means Conservative", he was often called by McClellan and Bush (as I recall - correct me if I'm wrong) - just the same way the other day Bush wanted to call on a reporter, the reporter wasn't there, and he said "well I'm looking for [name]", and pointed to someone and said "are you [name]" or something similar to that. He was looking for a reporter, if the reporter wasn't placed there, why would he be looking for her? I just have paraphrases here, but Mike Malloy on Air America had an audio clip of the instance. Maybe this blogger and reporter who call themselves liberals, should do their research first before claiming someone else doesn't know who they're talking.

...and particularly before kicking off a revival of old Right-Wing talking points.

JamesAquila - October 11, 2005 03:05 AM (GMT)
Barone obviously has a problem with Gore even though he claims to have voted for him. Barone repeats the lie that Gore stretched the truth in 2000 despite that being manufactured by the media.

As far the the alleged liberal blogger, he seems very anti-Gore too. As does most of the regulars on his site. I'm glad at least one took him to task:

QUOTE
Hmm,

You know, you actually give no sense of the speech at all. If you are going to label a speech "thoughtful" - and for my money, this speech is far beyond thoughtful - it's an amazing speech.

Out of a speech of 50 paragraphs, you pick two sentences, and simply take issue with two sentences, pieces of data. And even with these two pieces of data, the standards you hold are unrealistically high. "No evidence"? Remember, repeated instances of giving passes to an unqualified person (Gannon). Remember also, some evidence of Gannon being signed out far beyond the period of any press period...

Also, you are forgetting the LOCAL "fake news" set-reporter-pieces, that look like news, but were more infomercials shipped to tv stations.

"Digital brownshirts" - clearly a "term of art" - yes, an exaggeration, to make a point.

I would think "digital brownshirts" would apply to most political bloggers, on both sides....

At any rate - what about the CONTENT? You know, the other 99.9% of this speech that you deem "thoughtful?", while devoting your 99% of review to what wasn't "thoughtful"?

The analysis of TV as a one-way communication? Of the dominance of TV by large corporations? Of the mention of how, biologically, people respond to moving pictures? Of the historical tracing of TV, and the elimination of the equal time clause?

Anything?

For what it's worth, this post of yours looks simply like a dismissal of a speech that, in analytic power and clarity, captures much of what is wrong with the media landscape, which, I'm sure, you care about a great deal.





Hosted for free by InvisionFree