View Full Version: Ron Reagan to address Democratic convention

Al Gore Support Center Online Forum 2008 :: A Reality Based Organization Fighting For Al Gore! > General Democratic Talk > Ron Reagan to address Democratic convention



Title: Ron Reagan to address Democratic convention


bluebutterfly - July 12, 2004 01:43 PM (GMT)
BY GAIL SHISTER
Knight Ridder Newspapers

LOS ANGELES - (KRT) - In a move sure to embarrass Republicans, Ron Reagan will address the Democratic National Convention this month.
Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan and an outspoken critic of the Bush administration, will be at the podium on the second night of the four-day event in Boston, July 27, in support of stem-cell research, he said Sunday in an interview here.
David Wade, a spokesman for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, confirmed Reagan's appearance, but sources said the date had not been determined. Scott Stanzel, press secretary for President Bush's campaign, declined to comment.
Reagan, a Seattle resident with his wife, clinical psychologist Doria, said he was contacted about two weeks ago by the Democratic National Committee. He said he "had a nice chat" on the phone with Kerry, "but he wasn't pushing me. I had already decided."
A registered independent who has long been an outspoken political liberal, Reagan said he would not campaign for Kerry or any other candidate. He said he would vote for Kerry, however, "as a way to defeat Bush."
Reagan, 46, said he also did not vote for Bush in 2000, despite the fact that Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, was vice president during Ronald Reagan's two terms in the White House.
President Bush "has made some terrible mistakes," most notably, attacking Iraq, Reagan said.
Reagan also opposes Bush's stand on stem-cell research. That is the only reason Reagan accepted the Democrats' invitation, he said.
The Democratic Party's platform calls for lifting restrictions on research using stem cells from human embryos. Bush signed an executive order in August 2001 that limited federal help to financing stem-cell research on embryonic stem-cell lines then in existence. He said such a limit would not require the destruction of any more embryos.
Day-old embryos are destroyed when stem cells are extracted, and the process is opposed by some conservatives who link it to abortion.
Reagan and his mother, Nancy Reagan, are passionate advocates for stem-cell research, which could lead to a cure for Alzheimer's disease, among other disorders. After a 10-year battle against Alzheimer's, Ronald Reagan died June 5 at age 93.
"If they had asked me to say a few words about throwing George Bush out of office, I wouldn't do it," said Ron Reagan, in Los Angeles to attend "Hardball" host Chris Matthews' session with TV critics. Reagan is a political commentator for the show on MSNBC.
"This gives me a platform to educate people about stem-cell research," Reagan said. "The conservative right has a rather simplistic way of characterizing it as baby killing. We're not talking about fingers and toes and brains. This is a mass of a couple hundred undifferentiated cells."
Reagan, who will cover the Democratic and Republican conventions for "Hardball," said he expected criticism from many Republicans for his five-to-eight-minute speech to the Democrats.
"The Republican Party now is not the Republican Party of my father, not that it would be of great concern to me, one way or the other," he said. "I'm not a Republican and I never have been.
"My father wouldn't expect me to be a Republican just to emulate him. He raised his kids to be independent thinkers. ... I'm not terribly popular, apparently, with a lot of Republicans. I imagine some of them are pretty angry about what I've said about the Bush administration."
Should he be asked, Reagan said he would not attend the planned tribute to his father at the Republican convention, which is Aug. 30-Sept. 2 in New York.
"I don't think, in good conscience, I could take the chance that somebody could read that as an endorsement of this administration," he said. "I'll support any viable candidate who can defeat Bush."
Instead, Reagan suggested that the Republicans invite his half-brother, Michael, an evangelical and stem-cell research opponent, to speak at their gathering.
"Then we could have dueling Reagan sons," he said.
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/spec...17353063philly:

GSC Admin - July 12, 2004 01:49 PM (GMT)
Great! I love Ron. I hope John Kerry comes out in support of stem cell research in the near future. I fell the same way as Ron does about this. My mother and sister both have MS (multiple scerolsis) and it is one of the diseases that can be cured potentially with the research of stem cells.

Thanks Ron!

ErinB - July 12, 2004 02:55 PM (GMT)
My stepmother had ALS, a devastating form of MS and passed away last year. She had to go to Russia to get experimental treatments with stem cells. It is still in the infancy in terms of research but it seemed to help her a bit but she did lose the battle.

IGotMailYAY - July 12, 2004 04:37 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ErinB @ Jul 12 2004, 08:55 AM)
My stepmother had ALS, a devastating form of MS and passed away last year.  She had to go to Russia to get experimental treatments with stem cells. It is still in the infancy in terms of research but it seemed to help her a bit but she did lose the battle.

It is terrible to have anything like that happen in a family.

But if the research is so promising as people seem to think, why aren't the pharmautical companies putting more money into research? Why does it have to be federal money?

JamesAquila - July 12, 2004 05:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (IGotMailYAY @ Jul 12 2004, 12:37 PM)
It is terrible to have anything like that happen in a family.

But if the research is so promising as people seem to think, why aren't the pharmautical companies putting more money into research? Why does it have to be federal money?

Because pharmacetical companies only put money against what will treat diseases not what will cure them. Can't make money that way.

bluebutterfly - July 12, 2004 05:44 PM (GMT)
Now why didn't I think of that? Duh!

IGotMailYAY - July 12, 2004 05:53 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (JamesAquila @ Jul 12 2004, 11:34 AM)
QUOTE (IGotMailYAY @ Jul 12 2004, 12:37 PM)
It is terrible to have anything like that happen in a family.

But if the research is so promising as people seem to think, why aren't the pharmautical companies putting more money into research?  Why does it have to be federal money?

Because pharmacetical companies only put money against what will treat diseases not what will cure them. Can't make money that way.

Let me see if I have this correct.

Money is spent to only treat a disease, not cure a disease? :read:

I agree that finding a cure for everything would be nice, but is it realistic? Just because someone finds a cure for liberalism in you today, doesn't mean that when you breed, your off-spring will be conservative.

The only way you are going to cure all that effects us is to to alter our gentic makeup. Are you volunteering?

There is research going on everyday at the DNA level to find the what in our make up is causing these illnesses. :good:

ap215 - July 12, 2004 05:58 PM (GMT)
I'm looking foward to see Ron Reagan Jr on the convention,this is huge he's very smart on his politics and i totally support him on the stem cell research issue 100% and it's a joke that the republicans continue to ignore this issue. But i'm definately looking foward to see him appear in Boston.

GSC Admin - July 12, 2004 11:36 PM (GMT)
William Buckley Bashes Ron

http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak12.html

Amid the spontaneous outpouring of respect and affection for Ronald Reagan after his death, a discordant note was sounded by his son. In a succession of television and newspaper interviews, Ron Reagan Jr. used the occasion to trash George W. Bush by drawing invidious comparisons between his father and the current president. Nobody knew how to respond in a time of national mourning. Nobody, that is, except William F. Buckley Jr.

The elder statesman of the conservative movement considered Ron Jr.'s remarks a public challenge that ought to be challenged publicly. Buckley wrote Reagan a letter that specifically addressed his claim in an interview with the New York Times that he, as a self-professed atheist, admired the Buddhist teachings of ''mindfulness and loving kindness and compassion.'' Buckley told him: ''You proceed in a single interview to profane/deride the faith of your parents, which is not very mindful.''

There was more than one interview. In his graveside eulogy, the son threw a dart at President Bush by saying his father never wore ''his faith on his sleeve.'' That was just the beginning of attempts to dispel any notion that Bush was another Reagan. ''My father did not know George W. Bush from Adam,'' he said on CNN, adding: ''My father was a man -- that's the difference between him and Bush.'' As far as Republicans using the Reagan heritage, he said on MSNBC, ''This is their war. If they can't stand on their own two feet, they're no Ronald Reagans.''

This fit the desperate effort by Bush-bashers to keep the president from politically benefitting as a result of national grief over Reagan's passing. With publication in the New York Times Magazine of Ron Jr.'s interview with Deborah Solomon, Buckley wrote the son with a point-by-point response.

RR Jr.: The nude picture of his sister Patti in Playboy was ''just something that is not too exciting.''

WFB: ''Why then was there so much excitement about it?''

RR Jr.: As for his father's reaction when he dropped out of Yale to join the ballet, ''That was fine with him.''

WFB: ''It wasn't fine with him and he enlisted my aid in trying to persuade you to stay in college.''

RR Jr.: Having three cats while being childless ''is like having children.''

WFB: ''No, it's not like having children.''

RR Jr.: As to whether his mother helps him out financially, ''Of course not. My father felt that children should make their own way.''

WFB: ''I know, and you know that I know, something about that question. But to say that 'of course' your mother does not help you out suggests she will not do so even if there were a need. Are you saying she would not acknowledge you in her will?''

RR Jr.: As to the Abu Ghraib prison abuses, ''How can Christians tolerate it?''

WFB: ''I don't know of any Christians who 'tolerate it.' The perpetrators are reviled.''

RR Jr.: In an answer to a question, he said he did not vote for Bush in the last election.

WFB: ''Odd that you should permit this invasion of privacy whose only purpose is to remark the political infidelity of the son of Ronald Reagan.''

RR Jr.: His father ''worked hard to impress upon his children the value of kindness.''

WFB: ''If he did, he was manifestly unsuccessful.''

This is more than a wayward son, at age 46 with a career seemingly going nowhere, seeking 15 minutes of fame. He has signed with MSNBC as a ''contributor'' for the 2004 campaign. It is a windfall for Democratic operatives to quote the son of Ronald Reagan saying of Republicans: ''I couldn't join a party that, frankly, tolerates members who are bigots for one thing, homophobes, racists.''

Buckley and his National Review magazine were in the forefront of early Reagan supporters. In his newly published Miles Gone By: A Literary Autobiography, he paints a picture of a Ronald Reagan who ''was zestfully concerned for the comfort of others.'' Nobody has better credentials than Bill Buckley to deliver a point-by-point rebuttal to the errant offspring. Those who know Nancy Reagan say she fully agrees with her old friend.

GSC Admin - July 13, 2004 02:45 AM (GMT)
This is from PFG:

This is good news... However, will he have a more prominent slot than our President? Also, note the bolded words below. Will Democrats who attack us for this belief attack him now?
Jan

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/spec...password|Y

Posted on Sun, Jul. 11, 2004

Ron Reagan to address Democratic convention

BY GAIL SHISTER

Knight Ridder Newspapers


LOS ANGELES - (KRT) - In a move sure to embarrass Republicans, Ron Reagan will address the Democratic National Convention this month.

Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan and an outspoken critic of the Bush administration, will be at the podium on the second night of the four-day event in Boston, July 27, in support of stem-cell research, he said Sunday in an interview here.

David Wade, a spokesman for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, confirmed Reagan's appearance, but sources said the date had not been determined. Scott Stanzel, press secretary for President Bush's campaign, declined to comment.

Reagan, a Seattle resident with his wife, clinical psychologist Doria, said he was contacted about two weeks ago by the Democratic National Committee. He said he "had a nice chat" on the phone with Kerry, "but he wasn't pushing me. I had already decided."

A registered independent who has long been an outspoken political liberal, Reagan said he would not campaign for Kerry or any other candidate. He said he would vote for Kerry, however, "as a way to defeat Bush."

Reagan, 46, said he also did not vote for Bush in 2000, despite the fact that Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, was vice president during Ronald Reagan's two terms in the White House.

President Bush "has made some terrible mistakes," most notably, attacking Iraq, Reagan said.

Reagan also opposes Bush's stand on stem-cell research. That is the only reason Reagan accepted the Democrats' invitation, he said.

The Democratic Party's platform calls for lifting restrictions on research using stem cells from human embryos. Bush signed an executive order in August 2001 that limited federal help to financing stem-cell research on embryonic stem-cell lines then in existence. He said such a limit would not require the destruction of any more embryos.

Day-old embryos are destroyed when stem cells are extracted, and the process is opposed by some conservatives who link it to abortion.

Reagan and his mother, Nancy Reagan, are passionate advocates for stem-cell research, which could lead to a cure for Alzheimer's disease, among other disorders. After a 10-year battle against Alzheimer's, Ronald Reagan died June 5 at age 93.

"If they had asked me to say a few words about throwing George Bush out of office, I wouldn't do it," said Ron Reagan, in Los Angeles to attend "Hardball" host Chris Matthews' session with TV critics. Reagan is a political commentator for the show on MSNBC.

"This gives me a platform to educate people about stem-cell research," Reagan said. "The conservative right has a rather simplistic way of characterizing it as baby killing. We're not talking about fingers and toes and brains. This is a mass of a couple hundred undifferentiated cells."

Reagan, who will cover the Democratic and Republican conventions for "Hardball," said he expected criticism from many Republicans for his five-to-eight-minute speech to the Democrats.

"The Republican Party now is not the Republican Party of my father, not that it would be of great concern to me, one way or the other," he said. "I'm not a Republican and I never have been.

"My father wouldn't expect me to be a Republican just to emulate him. He raised his kids to be independent thinkers. ... I'm not terribly popular, apparently, with a lot of Republicans. I imagine some of them are pretty angry about what I've said about the Bush administration."

Should he be asked, Reagan said he would not attend the planned tribute to his father at the Republican convention, which is Aug. 30-Sept. 2 in New York.

"I don't think, in good conscience, I could take the chance that somebody could read that as an endorsement of this administration," he said. "I'll support any viable candidate who can defeat Bush."

Instead, Reagan suggested that the Republicans invite his half-brother, Michael, an evangelical and stem-cell research opponent, to speak at their gathering.

"Then we could have dueling Reagan sons," he said.
=============================================
What she doesn't understand is that he is not going to campaign because he doesn't want to, but because he can't due to his contract with MSNBC. Again, research before you speak.

earthmother - July 13, 2004 03:48 AM (GMT)
Three cheers for Ron, Jr. :clap: :clap: :clap:

At least Ronald Reagan managed to do ONE thing right in raising a child who can think for himself and not be afraid to make his opinions known.

And W.F. Buckley is a pompous ass. Always was, always will be. :bad:

bluebutterfly - July 19, 2004 02:22 PM (GMT)
To GOP, He's Dishonoring His Father
Affronted Republicans scramble to discredit Ron Reagan's scheduled speech on embryonic stem-cell research at the Democratic convention.


WASHINGTON — Ronald Reagan's spiritual heirs will fill the halls of the Republican National Convention in late August, but the Democrats have secured his flesh and blood for a prime-time spot at this month's bash in Boston.

Ron Reagan, the late president's 46-year-old son, plans to use the global platform of the Democratic National Convention to endorse embryonic stem-cell experiments, an area of research that some think his father would have opposed but which his mother supports.

Politically, the booking is a triumph for the Democratic ticket of Sens. John F. Kerry and John Edwards, which promptly trumpeted its ability to attract "individuals from all political backgrounds." Affronted Republicans moved to discredit the famously renegade son, who often disagreed with his family's politics and is an outspoken critic of President Bush.

"I think his speech is a cute little story for convention coverage, but I don't think it's the sort of thing that will influence any voters," said Gary Bauer, a conservative activist and domestic policy advisor to President Reagan.

Summing up a sentiment widely held among conservative groups, Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America called the planned public appearance "sad."

Ron Reagan's decision to deliver an address at the Democrats' showcase event has left Republican loyalists wondering: Is he an astute activist seizing the moment to promote a cause, or a traitor to his father's legacy?

Conservatives remember the younger Reagan's affinity for flustering his family — dropping out of Yale in 1976 to join the Joffrey Ballet, writing articles for Playboy magazine and professing atheism.

While his father was president, he recorded a public service announcement criticizing the government's AIDS policy and encouraging viewers to write to Congress or, as he suggested with a wry grin, "someone higher up."

"He is seen as someone who didn't hesitate to embarrass his family," one conservative leader remarked, reluctant to publicly criticize any member of the Reagan clan.

This time, though, the maverick son has his mother's blessing.

"She's OK with it," Reagan said last week on MSNBC, where he is a political commentator. "She supports the issue. She's aware, as I am, that there is a political aspect to this, and we need to be careful about that."

The former president's long bout with Alzheimer's, an incapacitating brain disease, helped reconcile the splintered family, which found an unexpected point of concurrence in supporting stem-cell research, said former Reagan advisor and family friend Michael Deaver.

Even before the former president's death last month, Nancy Reagan and her son and daughter, Patti Davis, pressed the urgency of the new science, which involves the destruction of human embryos and faces limits on federal funding imposed by Bush.

Scientists think the work could lead to treatments for a range of diseases, including Parkinson's, diabetes and Alzheimer's. (Reagan's older son from a previous marriage, Michael, opposes the research.)

Mrs. Reagan's position has been quietly forgiven by her most ardent conservative admirers in deference to her devotion to her husband, whom she lovingly saw through "the long goodbye." But they are far less tolerant of her son's view, questioning whether it is part of an attempt to use his father's passing to attack Bush.

In a gravesite eulogy June 11, some thought Ron Reagan took a discrete swipe at Bush, which aggravated many Republicans. "Dad … never made the fatal mistake of so many politicians: wearing his faith on his sleeve to gain political advantage," he said.

It was not the only time he appeared to be trying to distance Bush from his father's legacy. "My father really didn't know George W. Bush from Adam," he recently said on CNN.

The tributes to Ronald Reagan will continue at the GOP convention with a film honoring the late president, who died June 5 at age 93. Republican planners sought to invite Mrs. Reagan to their convention, but the message came back through family friends that she would decline.

"She needed some time for herself for a period," Deaver said.

Although Michael Reagan has consented to appear at the GOP convention, Ron Reagan's scheduled speech at the Democratic gathering is galling to many Republicans.

"Ron Jr. has either allowed himself to be used or he's knowingly partaking in something whose purpose is to damage the party his father spent all of his adult political life in," Bauer said.

A registered independent critical of both parties, Ron Reagan lives in Seattle with Doria, his wife of more than 20 years, who is also a former dancer. They have no children.

Reagan, who did not respond to requests for an interview, told MSNBC his speech would stick to the topic of science and avoid any Bush-bashing.

"I'm aware that some people will say … I'm being used by the Democrats. Maybe to some extent that's true. But then I'm using them too," he said.

For all the speculation, the question of whether the former president would have approved of his son's views or the venue where he has chosen to express them will remain forever unsettled. Reagan opposed legalized abortion, leading his followers to deduce that he would oppose embryonic stem-cell research.

Lou Cannon, author of five Reagan biographies, thinks Reagan would probably have struggled with the stem-cell question.

"While he had great certainty on issues like taxes, these were not the kinds of issues he felt great certainty about," Cannon said. "He tended to rely on Nancy on things like this. She was a doctor's daughter…. He would have respected her position."

What would have troubled him less is his son's decision to take a public stand, Cannon said. "He always thought his children were free to speak for whatever they wanted. I think he'd be happy to have his son politically involved. He probably would have joked that he too used to be a Democrat," Cannon said.

It is not unusual for the children of presidents to separate themselves from their powerful fathers in order to define their own identities, said Doug Wead, author of the book "All The Presidents' Children: Triumph and Tragedy in the Lives of America's First Families." President Reagan sought to reverse the New Deal policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt, a man his own father admired. In turn, Roosevelt's youngest son publicly endorsed President Reagan.

"That is not to say Ron Reagan Jr. is not sincere in his beliefs," Wead said. "But he may be expressing his need for individuality by saying, 'Look at me. This is the Democratic National Convention. How's them apples?' "

*

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na...a-home-politics

bluebutterfly - July 27, 2004 09:51 PM (GMT)
Stem Cell Proponents Enter Campaign Fray
By Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 26, 2004; Page A21

When Ronald Prescott Reagan takes the stage tomorrow night at the Democratic National Convention to promote human embryonic stem cell research, it will be more than a political poke in the eye to the man running as the heir to President Ronald Reagan's legacy. It will be a public relations coup for proponents of the research and could bolster a fresh line of attack against President Bush on a host of medical and scientific issues, according to advocates and political analysts...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A...anguage=printer

crazyuncle - July 28, 2004 05:22 AM (GMT)
I watched his speech and thought it came off well.
I thought that he gave a nice description of the production and usage. I thought his moral case was very compelling.
SOmeone above was asking about why the funds have to be from the Govt.
If I understand it, alot of the research is done in Universities, and they rely on the Fed money. If it is only private sponsorship there are some real problems with business competition. I can't speak for Pharmaceutical cos, but my dad has spent his life trying to cure people through his research at the U Of MN. I hope we can use any possible leverage to open up some of that education money, higher and basic.

GSC Admin - July 28, 2004 05:31 AM (GMT)
Yes, I think you are right CU. As I have posted before, this is an issue that is near to my heart also. My mother and sister both have MS, a disease that could be cured by stem cell research.

Also, glad to have you here on our site! How about editing your profile for us! We would love to get a feel for you like you location, age, name, etc. Also, feel free to choose an avatar of your choice!

Thanks again!

crazyuncle - July 28, 2004 09:27 PM (GMT)
I hope we can catch-up with what does this to people. It is so hard to convince people that it IS true, we ARE closer than ever to these microscopic criminals.
It is no help to have the drug dealers, I mean manufacturers, attempting to take all the credit for the research, clammor for Federal protections on that basis, and yet their fat cats turn around and support cutting the funding of the guys getting their hands dirty.
How can you feed every possible antibiotic to a barn stuffed with chickens, sell them over the counter in every pet store, yet warn human patients of "resistant" diseases. If we have a mutation in the chicken flu that can survive in our poultry factories, I'm pretty sure it will be "resistant," before it hits us. But don't stop those "farmers" from buying from the manufacturers, that's too expensive. These companies are not motivated by anything but profit margins and overheads. They are like the guns they use to hold us hostage.

bluebutterfly - July 29, 2004 10:51 PM (GMT)
Reagan's son takes political stage -- with the enemy

BOSTON, United States (AFP) - In a coup for the US Democrats, the youngest son of the late Republican icon Ronald Reagan seized their stage to take on George W. Bush over the future of medical research.

Ron Reagan claimed he wasn't making a political speech but criticized Bush's stance on stem-cell research, seen by many as a way to find a cure for diseases like Alzheimer's, which his father battled for a decade before dying in June.

"The topic at hand should not -- must not -- have anything to do with partisanship," said the 46-year-old maverick, whose appearance here in league with his late father's ideological rivals had set political tongues wagging.

"The theology of a few should not be allowed to forestall the health and well-being of the many," Reagan said. "How can we affirm life if we abandon those whose own lives are so desperately at risk?"

Bush signed an executive order in 2001 limiting the amount of federal money to be provided for research on stem cells, which are collected from human embryos.
Many conservatives oppose the research on religious and moral grounds, citing fears that cloning, which is used to produce the cells, might be used to reproduce human beings.

Many researchers believe stem cells could unlock the secrets of Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, spinal cord injuries and other debilitating conditions.

Some have suggested that former president Reagan, a tough-minded conservative who stuck to his political guns, would never have approved the use of embryos in medical research, even it could have saved his own life.

But son Ron and his mother Nancy Reagan, the former first lady, have been outspoken advocates for stem-cell research ever since the brain-wasting illness of Alzheimer's drove the president into seclusion a decade ago.

Without naming names, Reagan brought the 5,000 Democratic delegates here to their feet with cheers, saying that some opponents of stem-cell research were "just grinding a political axe (and) should be ashamed of themselves."

The Democratic party favours lifting curbs on stem-cell research, and Reagan called on voters to remember that when they go to the polls on November 2.

"The tide of history is with us. Like all generations who have come before ours, we are motivated by a thirst for knowledge," he said.

Painting the showdown between Bush and Democratic challenger John Kerry as a choice between "reason and ignorance," Reagan said: "We have a chance to take a giant stride forward for the good of all humanity."

If his appearance at the Democratic political extravaganza was an embarrassment for Republicans, it was not the first time he had caused a public relations fiasco for his family and his father's party.

He dropped out of college in the 1970s to try to join the ballet, loudly declared he did not believe in God and wrote articles for girlie magazine Playboy.

At his father's funeral, he said the former president "never made the fatal mistake of so many politicians, wearing his faith on his sleeve to gain political advantage." The remark was seen as a dig at Bush.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/a...an_040728130655




Hosted for free by InvisionFree