I rarely ever ignore a link someone presents me with. I skimmed the page, but I didn't
need to read it -and I realize how arrogant and closeminded that sounds to you- because of a little exercise I did when I found a link to the 9-11 Commission report, and I ask you to do the same. Click on the link below and type "Saddam" and tell me what you find, these are some exerpts I found:
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf "Bin Ladin was also willing to explore possibilities for cooperation with Iraq, even though Iraq's dictator, Saddam Hussein, had never had an Islamist agenda - save for his opportunistic pose as a defender of the faithful against "Crusaders" during the Gulf War of 1991.
Moreover, Bin Ladin had in fact been sponsoring anti-Saddam Islamists in Iraqi Kurdistan, and sought to attract them into his Islamic army."You're telling me Saddam - a control freak dictator - would want to "join forces" with unpredictable terrorists that wanted to depose him?
"There is also evidence that around this time Bin Ladin sent out a number of feelers to the Iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported to have received a significant response. According to one report, Saddam Hussein's efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the Saudis and other Middle Eastern regimes led him to stay clear of Bin Ladin"
Mohammad Atta's opinion of Saddam Hussein:
"To him, Saddam Hussein was an American stooge set up to give Washington an excuse to intervene in the Middle East."
I saw that same program last night, and I perhaps this was accidental, perhaps intentional, I don't know, but I noticed in your recount of the program you did not mention how non-chalante "the father of the modern conservative movement" Richard Viguerie was about basic facts and reporting
without spin or just down right lies. I would like to direct everyone to the transcript of this very revealing program (I wish they had the video up) of just how wreckless "the conservative noise machine" really is with the facts. All it cares about is winning the election for the next Republican Candidate, no matter how many "inconvenient facts" about Bush's incompetence before Sept.11th or how many of Bush's
lies before the Iraq war they have to step over and ignore. And no matter how many lives are lost in the process.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript351_full.htmlHere's a selection:
MOYERS: This past election Americans experienced the full might and moxie of the right wing media — frontline partisan warriors of a multibillion-dollar communications empire — whose goal is to shape public discourse, influence public opinion and win elections.
Think back to how right wing pundits ganged up to spread the message, without a shred of hard evidence, that Osama bin Laden's latest video, which arrived just days before the election meant the terrorist was supporting John Kerry.
LIMBAUGH [11/1/04]: This is highly suspicious to me, but it is what it is. I mean, Bin Laden sounds like the Kerry campaign. Bin Laden sounds like John Kerry.
MOYERS: Bin Laden "Urges Bush Defeat" read the headline in right wing tycoon Rupert Murdoch's NEW YORK POST. The very next day a POST columnist wrote that "A vote for Kerry is a vote for …terrorists….and Al Qaeda."
And listen to Sean Hannity:
HANNITY [10/29/04]: Why would Osama bin Laden, who's been quiet for so long, come out and virtually try and influence the election today in favor of John Kerry by attacking the president the way he did?
MOYERS: Do you think what Sean Hannity said is fair?
VIGUERIE: Oh, absolutely.
MOYERS: But there's no fact to back that up. There's no effort to substantiate that with documentation.
VIGUERIE: That's what journalism is. It's just all opinion. Just opinion.
MOYERS: So says Richard Viguerie, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still one of its most powerful figures. In this new book, Viguerie tells the story of how over the past 40 years the right came to dominate American politics by creating alternative and new media, everything from computerized direct mail to Fox News.
O'REILLY [10/29/04]: This Osama bin Laden video was just released late this afternoon. And I believe it will help President Bush.
MOYERS: Fox whipped the Osama tape into a perfect storm of Republican propaganda.
Bill O'Reilly.
O'REILLY [10/29/04]: But I want to know if you believe the way I do that this helps Bush or not?
MOYERS: Fred Barnes.
BARNES [10/29/04]: Next to actually capturing Osama Bin Laden, having him campaign against you was probably the best thing that could happen.
MOYERS: Peggy Noonan.
NOONAN [10/29/04]: George Bush weakened him. He hates Bush.
MOYERS: Dick Morris.
MORRIS [10/29/04]: So obviously it's a design on his part to help Kerry.
MOYERS: All opinion…not a whiff of reporting or documentation or evidence.
REPORTER: Conservative broadcaster Sean Hannity brought some friends to Pensacola to rally Republicans.
MOYERS: What do you make of the fact that Sean Hannity went barnstorming for the Bush-Cheney ticket the weekend before the election?
VIGUERIE: I just wish he could have done a little bit more. I thought it was just great. And we're not gonna play, Bill, by the liberal establishment's rules. They say, "This is acceptable and this is not acceptable."
Those days are gone and gone forever.You find this acceptable IGotMailYAY?