View Full Version: Proof Saddam had WMD

Al Gore Support Center Online Forum 2008 :: A Reality Based Organization Fighting For Al Gore! > International Issues > Proof Saddam had WMD



Title: Proof Saddam had WMD


igotmailyay - October 30, 2004 04:07 AM (GMT)
It's worth noting in all the debate over the missing explosives in Iraq that one of the three kinds of explosives at the center of the debate is HMX.

Why is that important? As former weapons inspector David Kay, who later lead the Iraq Survey Group's hunt for WMD in post-liberation Iraq, explained to CNN's Aaron Brown in a recent televised interview, HMX is a key component of nuclear bombs. Siad Kay, "HMX is in powder form because you actually use it to shape a spherical lens that is used to create the triggering device for nuclear weapons."

Therefore, it is now beyond doubt that Saddam's regime was in possession of at least some components of nuclear weapons of mass destruction as late as just weeks before the March 2003 start of the war, in violation of UN Resolution 1441 which required him to disclose and dispose of such materials. His failure to comply with 1441 created the legal justification for war.

President Bush told the truth about Saddam's WMD program. The tons and tons of HMX is more evidence of that.


igotmailyay - October 31, 2004 03:35 PM (GMT)
kick

ALGOREismylife - October 31, 2004 05:36 PM (GMT)
You Bush supporters will come up with all kinds of BULL to defend thay lying thief. Bush is a life long liar.

igotmailyay - October 31, 2004 06:05 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ALGOREismylife @ Oct 31 2004, 05:36 PM)
You Bush supporters will come up with all kinds of BULL to defend thay lying thief. Bush is a life long liar.

Having trouble dealing with the subject matter, so you instead resort to name calling. Unreal!!!!!!!!

ALGOREismylife - October 31, 2004 06:13 PM (GMT)
Hey, Igomailyay what name did I call you??????? Sounds like you are here to cause trouble, like all republicans that post here as unregistered guests. If you love Bush so much go to a pro-Bush site. We here love PRESIDENT AL GORE. If you don't like it, leave. And don't accuse me of something I didn't do.

igotmailyay - October 31, 2004 06:34 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ALGOREismylife @ Oct 31 2004, 06:13 PM)
Hey, Igomailyay what name did I call you??????? Sounds like you are here to cause trouble, like all republicans that post here as unregistered guests. If you love Bush so much go to a pro-Bush site. We here love PRESIDENT AL GORE. If you don't like it, leave. And don't accuse me of something I didn't do.

Why can't you have an honest discussion about what are important issues in this election?


igotmailyay - October 31, 2004 06:53 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ALGOREismylife @ Oct 31 2004, 06:13 PM)
Hey, Igomailyay what name did I call you??????? Sounds like you are here to cause trouble, like all republicans that post here as unregistered guests. If you love Bush so much go to a pro-Bush site. We here love PRESIDENT AL GORE. If you don't like it, leave. And don't accuse me of something I didn't do.

By calling Bush a liar, you avoid the subject and resort to name calling. Why is it difficult to recognize?

ALGOREismylife - October 31, 2004 07:12 PM (GMT)
BUSH is a LIAR. Honest discussion??? It's bad enough Bush stole 2000 election, but he has told lie upon lie for the past four years. He hasn't done one good thing, his self-centered arrogance is proof of that. He has made a disaster out of the entire world. What does it take to get through to you people???? I'm tired of arguing with misinformed and deceived Bush supporters.

igotmailyay - October 31, 2004 08:20 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (ALGOREismylife @ Oct 31 2004, 07:12 PM)
BUSH is a LIAR. Honest discussion??? It's bad enough Bush stole 2000 election, but he has told lie upon lie for the past four years. He hasn't done one good thing, his self-centered arrogance is proof of that. He has made a disaster out of the entire world. What does it take to get through to you people???? I'm tired of arguing with misinformed and deceived Bush supporters.

The irony of your posts are that you NEVER even attemped to address what I originally posted.

The HMX and the other high explosives are recognized as ingredients for the makings of WMD, namely a nuclear bomb. And with the amounts they are talking about it definately represents a stockpile.

In other words, George Bush did not lie.

GSC Admin - October 31, 2004 08:52 PM (GMT)
IGMY, as you posted in your first post, HMX is a component for a nuclear weapon. Does that count as stockpiles of nukes and other WMD's as the administration claimed? NO! The fact is the Bush administration lied to get us into Iraq as fast as they could, now they have no plan to win the peace. John Kerry on the other hand does have a plan that can work.

ALGOREismylife - October 31, 2004 11:49 PM (GMT)
Igotmailyay, I believe there were no WMD in Iraq, but the other point I was making which all you Bush supporters ignore is all his other lies. I'm sick of paying $2.50 for a damn gallon of gas thanks to Bush's lies and I'm sick of his oppresive ways, trying to trample all over us and kissing ass the damn EVIL RICH THUGS. Screw these hypocrite conservatives who want to deny rights, oppress women, African-americans and the working poor. I'm sick of his I don't give a damn attitude toward the average american.

O'Smiley - November 2, 2004 04:47 AM (GMT)
IGMY, this was weak! What a waste of time meant to deter te attention from more inportant topics. Just like the BUsh administration. Do you work for them? You reek of Texas horse maneur.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree